Agentic Cyber Services

AI agents that triage, prioritise and draft inside the security stack you already run, with your analysts in control of every change. Risk management and security operations, without adding another console.

Where security teams lose time today

Most security work is not hunting adversaries. It is repetitive, judgement-light effort that still has to be done carefully. These are the baselines measured in an enterprise security estate before agents were introduced.

Baseline

1 to 12 months

to complete one framework assessment

Baseline

1 to 2 days

lost each time a vulnerability fix reaches the wrong team

Baseline

5 to 10 min

of manual checks for every reported phish

Agents for your team's repetitive security work

Vulnerability management

Vulnerability Remediation

Scanners produce thousands of findings. Triaged on CVSS alone, fixes go to the wrong team.

Reads Defender findings, asset criticality and the owning team, then produces a prioritised work order for the right resolver team, approved by an analyst.

Outcome

1 to 2 days

lost on every misrouted fix, removed by routing on risk and ownership

Security operations

Phishing Triage

Every reported email means the same header, URL and attachment checks, done by hand.

Checks headers, sender, URLs and attachments, then hands the analyst a verdict with a confidence level, an evidence summary and a recommended action.

Outcome

5 to 10 min

of manual checks per reported phish, done by the agent before an analyst looks

Identity and access

Identity Lifecycle Automation

Joiner, mover and leaver tasks are worked by hand from tickets. Leavers keep access too long.

Acts on HR events and approved requests against your access policy, provisions access, removes leaver access and logs every step to your SIEM.

Modelled

~75%

less manual effort per access request

Governance, risk and compliance

Security Assessment

Framework assessments still run on email and spreadsheets, and take months to close.

Works through questionnaires, evidence and diagrams against framework controls, then returns maturity scores, gap findings and a remediation roadmap.

Target

2 weeks

per assessment, down from 1 to 12 months

What agentic security looks like in numbers

Agents work best as a closed loop from alert to root cause: detect, diagnose, escalate. Across that loop, the modelled saving in operational effort is around 60 per cent.

Modelled

~60%

less operational effort across the alert-to-root-cause loop

Modelled

~60%

less triage effort with anomaly triage

Modelled

~65%

less ticket handling with escalation and ITSM

Modelled

~55%

less diagnosis effort with root cause analysis

Baseline

~90%

of SIEM alerts were false positives

Baseline

20,000+

DLP alerts reviewed every day

Modelled

~75%

less analysis time per threat hunt

Target

40% or more

of threat-intelligence analyst hours freed

Baseline means measured before agents in an enterprise security estate. Modelled and target figures are projections, not guarantees. Results vary by estate.

Built to answer to your SOC

Read-only by default

Agents begin with read access to your tools. Nothing changes until you decide it should.

Humans approve changes

An analyst reviews and approves every change before it is made. The agent drafts and prepares; your team decides.

An identity per agent

Each agent has its own identity, so its access can be scoped, logged and audited like any other user.

Air-gapped option

For environments that cannot connect to external services, an air-gapped deployment is available.

Works with Microsoft Defender, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Entra ID and ServiceNow.

Beyond the first four agents

The same pattern extends across the security functions of enterprises that consume security, providers that deliver it as a service, and vendors that build and sell it. Agent design, ownership and buyer mapping are scoped with you for your own organisation.

Governance, risk and complianceThird-party and trustSecurity operationsIncident response and forensicsThreat intelligence and brandVulnerability and exposureIdentity and accessCloud securityApplication and product securityData protection and privacyAI security and governanceArchitecture, network and endpointOT and ICS securityHuman risk and fraudOffensive security and resilience

Who it is for

Enterprises

Banks, telcos, government entities, energy, retail and healthcare teams that want audit readiness, regulatory alignment and analyst hours released.

Security service providers

MSSPs, MDR providers and security practices that need more tenants per analyst and new sellable services.

Vendors and distributors

Product teams and channel organisations that want faster detection content, ticket deflection and stronger partner productivity.

Questions about agentic cyber services

What are agentic cyber services?

They are AI agents that take on repetitive security work such as triage, prioritisation and drafting, inside the security tools you already run. Your analysts review and approve every change.

Can an agent change my systems on its own?

No. Agents are read-only by default and humans approve changes before they are made.

Which tools do the agents work with?

Microsoft Defender, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Entra ID and ServiceNow.

Is an air-gapped deployment possible?

Yes. An air-gapped option is available for environments that cannot connect to external services.

Are the percentage figures guaranteed?

No. Baseline figures were measured before agents in an enterprise security estate. Modelled and target figures are projections, not guarantees, and results vary by estate.

How do we start?

Request a briefing. We will walk through the agents that fit your team and agree the first workflow to scope.

See what agents could take off your team